I watched a fantastic webinar put on by American Shipper in November that pointed to ( although they did not specifically mention) two presently underinsured or uninsured exposures- broker liability and contingent auto liability and why coverage is needed today. ( As in right now!)
Both coverages are not understood and frankly not part of the mainstream trucking insurance marketplace. With the current economy, many truck sales professionals are setting up brokerage authority or expanding brokerage sales-as trucking capacity is still tight in many areas. Even today's truckers, who are at an all-time high with respect to operating efficiencies, have found they do not either have the equipment or drivers to keep up with their shippers' needs or demands- and that is poor business. So they are setting up and expanding their brokerage operations both within and autonomous to their existing operating authority.
CSA 2010 will make capacity even tighter as crappy trucking operations and crappy drivers will not have long to fix it. And that spells bad news to the brokerage community- who even with best practices will find their operations exposed.
Some information I learned from the webinar corroborates the need for coverage. The Transportation Intermediaries Association understands that brokers need and will be required to have broker liability ( primary coverage) or contingent auto coverage ( secondary coverage). Why?
Truckers who continue to hire or retain unfit drivers will face litigation for negligent hiring and retention. Note a now famous court decision against the nation's largest brokerage operation C. H. Robinson further necessitates the need for coverage ( the Schramm decision).
Attorney Clay Porter, a true pro in the truck broker/ insurance arena has described the truck liability "vortex" well where there is a constant duty to supervise and retain records amongst other things from a best practices context.
Broker/ Shipper Liability can today be summarized by 6 exposures
* Respondeat Superior- the employer ( the truck broker) is responsible for the employee( the carrier). Even though the broker in all cases acts as an independent contractor, the courts are becoming sensitive to this bringing vicarious liability whereby one party is responsible for the actions of others
* Negligent Entrustment- causing injury due to instrumentality( a poor driver operating a extra heavy tractor)
* Claims under the Motor Carrier Act
* Claims that a Broker acted as a Motor Carrier
* Aiding and Abetting
* Negligent Hiring
While I want to emphasize I am no lawyer, it is pretty clear to me the biggest exposure to a broker is negligent hiring- and that a best practices approach needs to be delivered to the truck brokerage community- along with appropriate insurance ( yes we provide same so this may seem a tad self-serving which is not my intention).
Federal laws also necessitate coverage. Which ones?
+49 USC 14704- Rights and Remedies of Persons injured by carriers or brokers- Both the carrier or broker is liable for damages sustained by a person as an act or omission of that carrier or broker in violation of this part
+49 CFR 387.307- Broker surety bond or trust fund- the broker is liable to payments to shippers or motor carriers if the broker fails to carry out its contracts or agreements for supplying of transportation by authorized motor carriers.
Shippers are going to make their brokers have insurance. Attorney Porter says that the indemnity agreements that brokers and truckers are being forced to sign do not hold up in 23 states, meaning shippers will require insurance, waivers of subrogation, and additional insured requirements across the board.
One of the failures of the industry is that there is a fine line between liability exposure either on a primary or contingent basis versus a professional liability exposure ( yes we insure that too). Clearly its early days from a professional liability perspective and few shippers are requiring same of their brokers and virtually none of their truckers. You will see those products as well.
While I have not commented much about CSA 2010, suffice it to say that these factors in a large loss or claim will have impact on the broker that hired them:
^Unsafe Driving
^Fatigued Driving
^Poor Driver Fitness
^Drug and Alcohol Use
^Poor Vehicle Maintenance
^Cargo Securement
^Higher than Average Crash Indicator
These are primarilly no brainers for a plaintiff's attorney to go to war against a trucker or broker but the crash indicator of a trucker is not something available to the broker or general public as I understand it at this stage in time.
You can bet the truck insurance agents will be hit with insurance requests, waiver of subrogation requests, hold harmless contracts, and additional insured requests. And today, no one knows what to do with the exposure when there is more than one broker involved in the transaction.
Keep in touch on this and Happy Holidays.
Ben
Posted 20th December 2010 by Benji
0 Add a comment
Truck Broker Insurance NetworkWe are trying to create a working dialogue as to risk management issues involving truck brokers and truck broker insurance Magazine
ClassicFlipcardMagazineMosaicSidebarSnapshotTimeslideFeb
9
Frequently Asked Questions Revenue- the rating basis for most contingent cargo and truck broker liability policies is revenue. So we get asked what revenue do they actually use to determine the revenue. Is it the gross or the net.
Contingent Cargo
Is Hijacking terrorism?- while it could be, hijacking would be considered theft in most policies and covered.
Truck Broker Liability and Contingent Auto Liability
Seperate entity for Trucking Operation versus Truck Brokerage Operation:
The hardest part about underwriting brokerage operations in the same name as the trucking operation with their common and/or contract authority is the stacking of limits issue. One of the challenges even though most all policies have other insurance provisions the trucking policy ( usually written on the motor carrier form).Feb
1
Hanover Contingent Cargo Best Practices for Broker Carrier Agreements Hanover has the best coverage in the marketplace- but like so many insurers they want their insureds to exhibit best practices so that losses can be averted and so they can keep their premiums low. Part of those best practices is having the truck broker require better cargo coverage from their carriers.Feb
1
Markel Broker Carrier Contract Best Practices for HazMat More and more of our agents recognize the name of the game is for the truck broker to transfer as much insured risk down the supply chain as possible. That means two things:
1) Having a better broker carrier contract
2) Certifying te particulars of the broker carrier contract in an insurance certificate.
Markel is looking for truck brokers that exhibit best practices or are willing to exhibit best practices.Dec
5
If Truckers (Carriers) are having more Fatalities, What Does That Mean For The Truck Broker? It's an 18% jump in trucking fatalities in one year. Imagine how that translates to the higher incidence of injury claims. Candidly, that is not good news for truck brokers either as the loss cost per load has just risen.
In a press release issued Friday, the Truck Safety Coalition says truck crash fatalities rose to nearly 4000 in 2010, from 3,380 casualties in 2009.Nov
22
Contingent Cargo Coverage Form Comparison- Hanover versus Essex Both Hanover and Essex are leading carriers in the contingent cargo space . Hanover is known as the industry leader with the premier policy forms but they will not write every account. That being said, Essex has more limited coverage but will write the tough stuff. We like both carriers and feel they both have a place in the market.Nov
16
Dragonfly/Sperl Decision now Final- The Legal Precedent Game Changer for Truck Brokers and Freight Intermediaries And you thought the whole need for contingent auto and more importantly truck broker liability was bogus....
First there was Schramm; then there was Sperl. Both cases tapped C. H. Robinson for significant amounts.
The case mentioned that follows is known as the Dragonfly/ Sperl Decision and appeared in Transport Topics.
"The Illinois Supreme Court has denied an appeal request from C.H.Oct
24
Contingent Cargo Coverage Comparison- Lloyds Roanoke versus Hanover Frequently I am asked to do a coverage comparison on policies due to the technical nature of the business. While any coverage comparison should include a disclaimer that spells out any review is subject to the terms and conditions of the actual policy in force, it is interesting to see the wide array of coverages being sold and the lack of uniformity in the marketplace.Jun
21
What Contingent Cargo Insurance Actually Is We often get asked what contingent cargo insurance actually is. While we think it is pretty simple, it is not really easy for those that are not in that space every day.
As an underwriter of this coverage, I feel you get specificity and a better definition by actually looking at the insuring agreement and property covered by a specific policy.Apr
8
Truck Broker Best Practices For Insurance Why should a truck broker care to exhibit insurance best practices in the first place? Well, the answer is easy frankly and dovetails the reason they bought insurance coverage in the first place- risk management, sales and ultimately profitability.Apr
8
Why Truck Brokers Need Insurance Not unlike trucking companies, truck brokers, although not operating as an asset based carrier, need insurance too.
Why?
Even tough they are not liable through federal statute, truck brokers deal with both shippers (their customers) and trucking companies ( their vendors). Typically the truck broker have to sign a broker-shipper agreement which makes them legally responsible for the auto liability and motor truck cargo exposures as they arrange shipments on behalf of the shipper.Mar
18
Freight Forwarder Versus Truck Broker- Know the Difference and Why it's Important A freight forwarder is a common carrier under the law and with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). A freight forwarder has the same auto and cargo insurance and claims responsibility as that of a motor carrier.
A broker is not a carrier. Brokers arrange transportation with a carrier, either on behalf of the shipper or behalf of the carrier.Dec
29
Truck Broker Liability Legal Precedents What is peculiar about insurance sometimes is that sometimes there needs to be communicated where the losses could happen- ergo the legal precedents. It is important to understand that broker liability is a developing area, not a mature area of the law. This exercise and narrative below will simply prove the need for coverage.Dec
23
Lloyds Contingent Auto Liability (CAL) versus Markel Truck Broker Liability (TBL) We are asked nearly everyday to describe the differences between contingent auto liability and truck broker liability. It's a fair request but it is important to look at the history of coverage for truck brokers.
Heretofore, at this time last year, there was only contingent auto liability with one exception, the Chartis program of primary truck broker liability.Dec
20
What Shippers and Brokers Need to Know to Manage Their Liability Exposure and The Effects of CSA 2010 I watched a fantastic webinar put on by American Shipper in November that pointed to ( although they did not specifically mention) two presently underinsured or uninsured exposures- broker liability and contingent auto liability and why coverage is needed today. ( As in right now!)
Both coverages are not understood and frankly not part of the mainstream trucking insurance marketplace.
No comments:
Post a Comment